
Ronald Williams, 1947-1975 Jack Coler, 1947-1975
The evidence against Peltier has only grown in credibility and corroborative value since that fateful day in 1975. Just a few years ago, in February, 2004, the former common-law wife of AIM leader Dennis Banks recalled what Peltier said a few months after the murders. Ka-Mook Banks was testifying in another murder trial, that of Arlo Looking Cloud, convicted of aiding and abetting the murder of fellow AIM member Anna Mae Pictou Aquash. Just as the young Agents were brutally deprived of their lives, so was 30-year-old Anna Mae deprived of her life on orders from the AIM leadership. As the Supreme Court of British Columbia so stated, coincidentally on June 26th, 2007:
“Anna Mae Aquash was executed by a single gunshot to the back of her head on orders from the American Indian Movement because they believed her to be an informant for the F.B.I.”
Anna Mae Pictou Aquash, 1945-1975
The AIM leadership had guessed wrong. Anna Mae was never an informant for the FBI. With the same level of ruthlessness, Leonard Peltier executed Ron Williams and Jack Coler some six months before his leaders would mete out the same punishment to Anna Mae. Peltier also acted under false assumptions, believing the Agents were there to arrest him. The Agents did not even know he was on the reservation. In the Looking Cloud trial, Peltier’s name came up somewhat unexpectedly, this time in relation to Anna Mae’s state of mind. When questioned by the US Attorney, Ka-Mook bravely testified to the words of a man who admitted his guilt in a forgotten moment of braggadocio and in the process, implicated himself in Anna Mae's demise as well:
McMahon: While you were camping in Washington state, was Anna Mae allowed to leave by herself?
Ka-Mook: No.
McMahon: Was she always being watched?
Ka-Mook: Somebody always went around with her.
McMahon: Were there any allegations or accusations made toward her while you were camping in Washington state?
Ka-Mook: Yes.
McMahon: Who made those?
Ka-Mook: Leonard.
McMahon: Did you hear him?
Ka-Mook: Yes.
McMahon: What did he say?
Objection overruled.
McMahon: What did Mr. Peltier say?
Ka-Mook: He said that he believed she was a fed, and that he was going to get some truth serum and give it to her so that she would tell the truth.
McMahon: While you were camping in Washington, were there any discussions had in which you and Anna Mae were present in which sensitive material that you wouldn’t have wanted in the hands of law enforcement was discussed?
Ka-Mook: Yes.
McMahon: Give me an example?
Objection overruled.
Ka-Mook: We were sitting one day at the table in this motor home. Anna Mae was sitting by me, and my sister was on the other side, and Dennis was standing in the aisle, and Leonard was sitting on this side, he alternated between sitting and standing. And he started talking about June 26, and he put his hand like this [gesture holding a gun] and started talking about the two FBI Agents.
McMahon: What did he say?
Objection overruled.
McMahon: Tell the Court as best you remember exactly what he said.
Ka-Mook: Exactly what he said?
McMahon: Exactly what he said.
Ka-Mook (extremely upset): He said the motherfucker was begging for his life, but I shot him anyway.
Next time: Why "Mafia" and why now?
6 comments:
Thank you for starting this blog on June 26 to honor the innocent people who were murdered.
You have a lot of courage to fight the big lies of those AIM leaders.
I hope the trial of john Graham will bring the truth to light.
In your book American Indian Mafia, I THINK you wrote that many of the Wounded Knee Legal Defense Offence Committee people who destroyed the Indian town of Wounded Knee actually worked for government-funded social service organizations.
I can't locate this passage now, but could you write a bit about that?
I am all for public social service organizations and private charities, but these days they are sometimes taken over by people with radical political agendas.
It seems to me that WKLDOC is an early example of this.
How can we defend these organizations from being co-opted?
On page 457 of your book, you note that Peltier had escaped from prison on November 16, 1975 and was not recaptured until Feb. 6, 1976. So he was on the run during the time that Aquash was killed.
Peltier has also stated that he was in the US--not Canada--during the time she was probably killed.
He claims he was in prison in December when he heard she had been killed, but nobody knew she had been killed then--except people who were involved.
And he was not in prison in December because he escaped in November. How did he know Aquash was dead if her unidentified body wasn't found until Feb 24, and her family was not notified of her identity until March 5?
It makes me wonder if he had some complicity in her killing.
Every page of your book shows how these people tell contradictory accounts about themselves and say things that are at variance with the public record.
It is confusing. You have to check every word Peltier says.
I think you have written in an Indian publication and on your site that Bruce Ellison was allegedly one of the people at the meeting where the "problem" of Anna Mae was discussed while she was being held prior to her murder. Witnesses said Ellison said to "untie" Anna Mae.
Ellison blames the FBI for this murder, but I read he takes the fifth when asked about all this before grand juries. It wasn't the FBI who kidnapped and murdered her.
Ellison was also a member of the Wounded Knee Legal Defense Offence Committee called WKLDOC which had communists in it. The goal of those kind of people is to defame the FBI, not defend Indians.
I think these people who discussed Anna May's fate probably put these two much younger Indian guys up to this killing, but unless they tell the truth and say who ordered this killing, they don't deserve any mercy from the court.
They were young and manipulated, but they knew killing was wrong.
I believe an analysis of the FBI covert program COINTELPRO might be in order. While you suggest that this is a time for healing, you continue to paint AIM and Native American traditionalists as against the mainstream. There is weak discussion of the assassinations that were taking place on Pine Ridge prior to the appearance of AIM. Assassinations that were taking place because traditionalists opposed the selling off of a large parcel of land for corporate development by a highly corrupt individual who was supported by .... I think we both know who was supporting this transaction. In contrast, one might read Peter Matthiessen's IN THE SPIRIT OF CRAZY HORSE and then judge.
Obviously, many have taken very passionate views on both sides of this tragic issue. There is an incredible amount of information out there and I agree that you must be willing to take each point, and sometimes each word, and dissect it for the real truth. Debate is essential to gaining clear understanding. After reading a good bit of information this site provides, the dissection process will be a long one, but one worthy of the time.
Post a Comment